The use of social media sites continues to grow at an increasing rate over time. Over the past 3 years, the use of social media sites has increased by 500%. With this new form of communication available today, it is critical to ensure that investors are protected from false and misleading claims. Firms are responsible to appropriately supervise their employee’s participation in the use of these mediums. It is recommended that firms focus on the following areas:
• Recordkeeping
• Suitability
• Supervision
• Third-Party Posting
The use of social media sites such as Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter has grown tremendously in recent years. Each of these are becoming an ever-popular way of communicating.
FINRA’s rules regarding communicating with the public apply to social media sites that are sponsored by a firm or its registered representatives. Although utilizing these various forms of communicating presents tremendous opportunities, it also presents unique challenges, especially in regard to recordkeeping and investor protection.
Recordkeeping
One of the primary concerns for using social media sites for communication is recordkeeping. Just like all other forms of public communication, firms are required to retain records of its business related communications made through social media sites. This requirement covers everything that is posted on these sites about a firm’s business. This includes messages on a customer’s wall in Facebook or comments on a blog.
If a firm communicates through these sites or permits employees to use these sites for business, it must ensure that it can retain the records of those communications under all applicable FINRA and SEC rules.
Suitability
Suitability is another area that needs to be considered when using social media sites. According to FINRA’s suitability rule, “any recommendation to buy or sell a security must be suitable for the customer”. Firms are required to ensure that a recommendation is suitable for every investor to whom it’s made. This needs to be kept in mind when using blogs and social networking sites because these communication tools can easily make content widely available. Many of these sites include options to limit access to content. Firms are however, still required to take great care to identify the entire potential audience of a communication and make sure any recommendations made through them are suitable for every single audience member. Whether a particular communication constitutes a recommendation depends on its fact and circumstances. To make this determination FINRA Notice to Members 01-23 describes guidance about suitability focusing on the content, context and the manner of presentation.
Supervision
Firms are also required to supervise the use of social media sites, especially when recommendations about specific investment products are being made. These communications are required to comply with the suitability and recordkeeping rules. They are also required to include additional disclosures like those required by the Federal Securities Laws.
Firms are responsible to adopt policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to address these communications. Many firms prohibit representatives from using any interactive electronic communications to recommend or mention a specific investment product unless a registered principal has previously approved the content. Firms should also maintain a database of previously approved communications that employees can use as a template.
Social networking sites can include interactive communications as well as static communications. This may require a different kind of communication. Unscripted communication in an interactive forum like a chat room or online seminar is considered a public appearance.
These are subject to FINRA communications rules but unscripted remarks do not require prior principal approval. However, static posting are often times considered advertisements and do require documented prior principal approval. This presents a challenge as each firm may be required to supervise blogs differently based upon how they are constructed and used.
If a blog is used by a firm or representative to engage in real-time interactive communications, it would be considered as an interactive communications forum that require supervision but not prior principal approval. Static posts by a blogger are considered advertisements which require documented prior pre-approval by a registered principal.
Social networking sites like Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter also include both static and interactive content. Static content like profile and background information must be treated as an advertisement. However, non-static, real-time communications such as interactive Facebook comments and Twitter Tweets constitute an interactive electronic forum. It is important to keep in mind that regardless of whether the communication is interactive or static, supervision is required to ensure that communications through social media sites do not include any misleading statements or claims and comply with FINRA’s communications rules.
Firms are allowed to use risk-based rules to determine how much review of its incoming and outgoing and internal electronic communications is necessary for the proper supervision of its business. Risk-based-principles can take into account the firm’s business model, size, location, number and types of transactions as well as other factors. Based upon your firms unique risk profile, you may be required to obtain principal review for some or even all interactive electronic communications prior to use. This is true even if the type of communication does not require prior principal approval under FINRA rules.
To ensure compliance and proper supervision, your firm may place restrictions on which of its personnel are permitted to establish a social media site. Regardless of the type of supervisory system a firm utilizes, it must also have policies and procedures in place for supervisory review of all electronic communications regarding certain areas such as customer complaints and order errors.
Firms should prohibit any unsupervised use of social media sites for any business communications and require proper training for those individuals that do engage in such communications. Additionally, your firm may restrict or prohibit the use of social media sites by employees who have presented compliance risk historically. If a firm discovers any problems with the way that social media sites are being used, it should make sure to take appropriate disciplinary action.
Third-Party Postings
Third-party content does not generally constitute communications with the public by a firm. However, if a firm is involved with preparing the content of a third-party post, or explicitly or implicitly endorses or approves the content, a firm may be held responsible for the content and may be required according to FINRA rules to archive and supervise the content. It is suggested that firms consider a disclaimer on its site that informs customers that third-party posts do not reflect the views of the firm and have not been reviewed by the firm. This type of disclaimer is not required, however, it would be considered as a part of the facts and circumstances in a FINRA compliance analysis. Disclaimers can be a factor based upon how prominently or consistently they are displayed.
If a firm currently utilizes, or is considering utilizing social media site, it is imperative that your policies and procedures include the necessary steps to comply with all appropriate regulatory requirements.
If you would like more information regarding this topic or training tools to ensure that you and your firm comply, contact our Sales Department at 877-593-3366 or sales@questce.com.